20 - May 17th thru May 23rd 1999, Vol
IX
Education
in Yemen: To Be or Not To Be
This is an OPINION page.
Every week, a different intellectual writes
a FOCUS on a pertinent issue!
By:
Mohamed Hatem Al-Qadhi,
Taiz Bureau Editor, Yemen Times.
It is common knowledge that education and development go hand in hand.
Education is a main factor in the development process. Any progress in
society is attributed to the skills and abilities of the people. These
generally depend on the kind of education they get.
This reality explains why education claims the largest budgetary allocation
in most countries. It also explains why families insist on giving their
children the best education they can. It finally explains why education
in most societies is provided free to all.
In other words, education is an investment.
In Yemen we cannot deny that we have made some laudable strides in the
field of education after the Yemeni revolution. But, we should say that
our educational process is now facing a large number of ordeals and pitfalls,
which I want to discuss.
Low Competence:
It is obvious that the performance of most of the students is very
low right now. The competence of the students is continuously dropping,
since they suffer under many shortcomings in the educational system. But
the most important problem must be the performance of teachers.
Owing to economic hardships, teachers are not giving the students their
best. They feel that if they rely on the government salary only, they will
not be able to make ends meet. Hence, they are busy with other jobs. Some
work as shift cabbis - taxi drivers; some do part-time office work, some
even do menial labor. In short, the students don't get their full attention.
Teachers are now beginning to lose their respect within the community.
Curriculum & Syllabus:
Another menace facing education in Yemen is the curriculum or syllabus.
Curricula are defined by the government to achieve long-term, vital goals
of the nation. Books and teaching aids are the tools to use in reaching
those goals.
Therefore, we should ask the people in charge of education whether
the current curricula will take us to our goals. I am not an expert in
curricula, but as a person who has taught English for some time, I feel
that some of the subjects taught in schools are archaic and outdated. They
cannot be useful to our students living in the era of the computer, internet,
and intranet. The volume of science courses is too small in comparison
with the theoretical courses. Besides, there is hardly any hands-on training
and experiments.
In most countries, there is a periodic review of the curricula in order
to upgrade the information the students receive. In Yemen, this is lacking.
That is why some of the things taught in our classes are rather funny,
if not absurd.
Even if the syllabus is good, the teaching aids going with it are not
available. Let us take an example. The English Crescent series is provided
with good recorded songs and dialogues that could make learning very exciting.
Unfortunately, the tapes and recorders are not available in schools. Conditions
in schools in the countryside are even more pathetic. Over 120 students
cuddle up to each other in each small classroom, and often must sit on
the ground.
Sometimes, the people in charge of restructuring educational plans and
amend syllabuses are not among the most capable educators persons. The
committee appointed by a republican decree a few weeks ago was largely
composed of people who are qualified in religious matters rather than in
education. The people included in the list were those who made the most
noise, but not those who were the most qualified.
Unified Educational System:
Another nagging problem is the issue of unifying the educational system.
There are still two educational systems today. The first is controlled
by the government, and the other by the Islah Party. In spite of heated
debates regarding the issue of unifying the school systems, nothing has
been done. Politics is standing in the way.
Education should serve the development process, and not the political
interests of parties. The question of unifying educational systems should
be the main concern of the government, whatever its political colors. The
existence of two educational systems in one country will lead to different
results among many of the children. It means having two generations of
different beliefs, attitudes, and tendencies towards national issues. It
creates a chasm between our students.
Private Education:
Private education has spread remarkably in the last few years due to
the privatization drive. In theory, this is a good thing, as the state
has been unable to provide high quality education to all.
In practice, however, some businessmen have found they can make a lot
of money by investing in private schools. Unfortunately, given the lapse
in adequate supervision, these "investors" have cut too many corners
in the way they manage their investments. So, some flats were converted
into schools. The children of rich families also discovered that "money
talks" even in schools. Thus, certificates have become available on
sale!
There are already 300 private schools all over the country today, mostly
in the large cities. The Ministry of Education claims it has licensed less
than 30% of this number. Yet, they are all in operation.
In the continued absence of the supervision of the Ministry of Education,
private schools will exacerbate an already bad educational situation. Privatization
should not mean chaos, especially not in education, which is the lifeline
of our future.
To add insult to injury, we now have private universities which offer
BA, B.Sc., MA, M.Eng. M.Sc.and other degrees. We have 7 private universities
and preparations for establishing another in Lahej are in full swing. But
can these be labeled as true universities?
Some investors rented flats and buildings and converted them into universities.
Just pay a visit to Al-Rabat Street in Sanaa, you can find three universities
on this small street. These investors have also come up with ingenious
new ideas. Students who are busy with some other business, can just pay
the tuition, and come at the end of the term/year to take the exam. They
are basically assured of success. And because the government is oblivious
to the long term impact, it is very easy for a person to "BUY" a
license to establish a university.
I was once discussing this issue with a rector of one of our new universities.
He told me that he is not satisfied with the situation of the undergraduate
education, let alone the higher study. He said that he was against the
idea of establishing universities all over the country. Even the large
state universities in Sanaa, Taiz and Aden, are lacking in many of the
proper facilities. They do not offer appropriate academic services, especially
not in research and laboratory work.
Yemeni universities focus on humanities and theoretical studies. Enrollment
in the hard sciences in the academic year 1997-1998 was estimated at 16%
of the total university student body.
Are we aware of the fact that only vocational and technical education
can generate the skills our country needs? Are we aware that there are
thousands of university graduates who are unemployed today because they
do not have employable skills?
I once read a fine article in the "Focus" page of the Yemen
Times, issue 14 by an American expert, Bob Sherman. He noted that Yemen
would be better off if it applied a "community college" approach.
University Curriculum
The question of university curricula is another pitfall facing university
education. It is clear that there are no strategic or long-term plans for
post-graduate education. Everything moves erratically. University education
is different from that of schools, for the former depends mainly on researching
and referencing. Universities are places for discussing issues. This is
why university education becomes the principal factor of development.
Due to the lack of reference materials, some teachers either copy from
books or summarize books into hand-outs. It is unfortunate to find that
some teachers engage their students in memorizing their hand-outs, and
require them to reproduce them on exam sheets.
Students' lives now revolve around their hand-outs. Imagine, some students
spend more than four years in college without even having stepped into
the library. In this way we produce parrots rather than scholars who can
repay their nation.
Examination-oriented syllabuses make students receptive rather than
interactive.
There is a workshop on curricula planned for 18-19 of May at Taiz University.
I hope this gathering will address this issue fully.
The question of university curricula is very important. It must be
undertaken by educators who have experience in this field. It is not wrong
to fallback on the experience of others, but I believe indigenous solutions
are necessary.
Let me give an example. The government adopted the idea of establishing
institutes for teacher training from Jordan. That is fine. But, letting
Jordanian educators work out the syllabus for these institutes in Yemen
is not fine. Why? Because these people do not understand our educational
situation well enough. This makes our syllabus a carbon copy of the Jordanian
one, which does not serve us well.
I believe Yemen has enough educational experts who, if given a chance,
could work miracles for our educational system. But, may be because everything
is measured by political considerations, fools have become scholars.
To conclude, the question of education should be given top priority
by the government and the public, because it is our ticket to the future!
|