06 - February 8th thru February 14th
1999, Vol IX
Spain
to Engage Yemen More Actively
It
is well known that Spain and Yemen enjoy a very special relationship, which
strengthened throughout the years, and reached its peak after the memorandum
of understanding signed in December 1997. Apart from being a very close
friend, Spain is also a contributer to the economic and democratic reforms
in Yemen. This can be seen from the softloans and financial contributions
worth millions of dollars it gave to Yemen.
Hatem Bamehriz of the Yemen Times filed the following interview
with H.E. Mr. Jose Antonio Sabadell, the First Secretary and the Deputy
Head of Missions at the Embassy of Spain in Riyadh.
Q: Would you please introduce yourself?
A: My name is Jose Antonio Sabadell.
I am the First Secretary and the Deputy Head of Missions at the Embassy
of Spain in Riyadh.
Q: Is this your first visit to Yemen?
A: No, I have visited Yemen before.
Yemen is a beautiful country, and I like to visit it as often as I can.
I feel at home when I am in Yemen. In addition to this, Yemen and Spain
have a very special relationship.
Q: What is the purpose of this visit?
A: We do have visits made on regular
basis to Yemen, by different members of the embassy, and that includes
the ambassador, and other people responsible of different fields of bilateral
relations. On one side we have commercial relations. Our commercial consular
comes to Yemen every few months, as do I.
Q: How are Yemeni-Spanish relations?
A: I have already met some people
I wanted to see, and I have spoken to different people in the government,
other embassies, as well as commercial organizations in order to gain an
idea of how the country is doing, and what its prospects are? I will be
meeting more people in the next few days. I think our relations are positive,
and we try to maintain and enhance it. As I always say, not having an embassy
here forces us to work more to keep the relations on a very good level,
as they are now. Mr. Alwan Shaibani, our Honorary Consul is doing a very
good and important job.
Q: What are the fields of cooperation between
Spain and Yemen?
A: We have more than one field,
and it's a continuation of already excellent relations. On one hand from
the commercial and economical point of view, I think there are an increasing
number of Spanish companies that are taking an interest in Yemen. In this
respect a soft loan of $30 million dollars has been approved, which will
be designated to electricity, and $2 million dollars for feasability studies.
From the point of view of tourism, there are an important number of Spanish
tourists visiting Yemen every year. From a cultural point of view, we will
try and make our offer of scholarships more available to Yemeni scholars,
so they can benefit from it. There is also an invitation which has been
extended by the minister of foreign affairs in Yemen to the minister of
foreign affairs in Spain, which has been accepted, and we are trying to
fix an appropriate date for this visit.
Q: How do Spanish tourists feel about Yemen?
A: Yemen has so much to offer,
in almost every respect, such as landscape, culture, history, and the hospitality
of Yemenis, and Spanish tourists appreciate that. I know many people, who
had visited Yemen, and they all are extremely satisfied with their visit,
and they are looking forward to coming back.
Q: Mr. Alwan Shaibani, would you like to add
something?
The bilateral relationship between the two countries
is not new. As a matter of fact Spain had provided a soft loan of $ 30
million to the Republican hospital in 1990. Unfortunately, the project
did not materialize due to the Gulf war. In the last eight years Spain
has provided a few shipments of medicine to the ministry of health, which
were very much appreciated by the Yemeni government.
Who
Benefits from Undermining Tourism and Investment in Yemen?
By: Ismail Al-Ghabiry
Yemen Times
It is hard to talk about investment in Yemen without
talking about the recent rise in abduction (or kidnapping) cases and its
subsequent impact on the tourism industry and foreign investment.
Abduction of foreign nationals began in 1992
by tribesman to exert pressure on the government, principally to make personal
gain, to bargain for more development projects, or to draw the government's
attention to a particular injustice done on them. Except for the latest
Abyan incident, all abduction cases ended peacefully through negotiations.
It has been suspected for some time that some foreign forces encourage
tribesmen to carry out abduction incidents to undermine the country's development
efforts, especially in the tourism and investment areas. The rate of abduction
incidents increased in the past two years alarmingly. In parallel with
these incidents following the 1994 war, many bomb attacks occurred from
time to time, largely confined to the southern provinces. It was widely
thought that secessionist groups were behind these incidents, which the
security forces managed to engulf.
We all remember the sad Abyan incident in December
1998. Extremists in the province of Abyan abducted a large group of tourists.
The hijackers identifies themselves as faithful Muslims fighting enemies
of Islam, in particular, they meant westerners. They gave the government
a list of demands and an ultimatum after which they threatened -as all
kidnappers do- to kill the hostages. The government in a speedy reaction
decided to crack down the hideout, and release the tourists. While most
of the tourists were rescued, four were killed during the storming. After
the kidnappers were arrested, they confessed that they belonged to a group
lead by Abu Hamza, an Egyptian national who lives in London. A few days
after the rescue operation, security organs captured a group of young British
passport holders of Yemen and foreign origin and found in their possession
explosives, advanced communication systems, arms, and designators. Police
investigations revealed that they planned to carry out a number of terrorist
attacks including the bombing of the British consulate in Aden. Abu Hamza
threatened the Yemeni authorities of killing more foreign nationals in
Yemen unless the hijackers are released. He also admitted giving permission
to kill the Abyan case hostages. On the 22nd of January, the Yemeni government
announced that the remainder of the Abyan kidnappers had been captured
a well, and that one of them was the son of Abu Hamza himself.
The escalation of the terrorist incidents coincide
with the tourist season which had began to flourish in the past few years,
and further coincided with the intense efforts to attract foreign investment
and with preparations to open the first phase of the Free Zone in Aden
next month.
The sequence of events, their scale, foreign
elements involved, sophisticated weapons used and timing constitute empirical
evidence that the waves of terror are imported to Yemen. They also show
that they are too well organized, and too well financed to be the product
of local conspiracy alone.
People ask: "Why should a group of British
passport holders who have high living standards in the UK come to Yemen
to carry out such terrorist attacks? and against whom? British targets!"
Indeed, why risk their lives? What are the motives and gains? What interests
does the Egyptian Extremist Abu Hamza have in waging this terrorist war,
and sending his own son to be a part of his campaign against a country
like Yemen?
If Abu Hamza is a self proclaimed defender of
Islam, and wants to fight non-Muslims, surely doing that would have been
much easier for him where he is, and not in Yemen, or in any other country.
Islam, the religion of tolerance and peace, is
being exploited by some individuals and groups to settle political scores.
Islam is unfortunately being taken as a pretext to fight the very same
principles of Islam.
In conclusion, there are many activities happening
around us that need to be explained and dealt with. We must be ready to
face any threat of disturbing our development in two very important sectors:
tourism, and investment. For without them, we cannot even assume that we
will be able to cope with the ever-changing world around us.
Tips
on How to Succeed in Business;
and a Call to Invest in
Iron Ore
By: Sa'ad Al-Mufti,
Consultant Mechnical Engineer
When we create an industry, we must look into
the five factors for its success - what I call (5 Ms), as follows:
1.
Material:
This is most important in the success of any
industry. Here we are talking about raw material and other inputs.
2. Market:
When you produce something, you have to make
sure you can sell it. A good market is the basic factor for success of
any industry.
3. Management:
Many industries fail because of bad management.
How you put your resources together and go about your activities is critical.
4. Money:
Whether it is adequate capital upon investing,
or whether it is a proper cash flow, money is at the heart of any successful
business.
5. Men:
Trained, dedicated and highly motivated staff
are the key to success. We call it men, but of course, it includes those
indispensable women.
Now that we know the five Ms, let us go to a specific
project - iron ores in Rada'a. These ores await investors to go into their
extraction and use. Yemen today imports a lot of pig iron. We could be
a net exporter of pig iron to the international market.
In addition, we import a lot of iron in two types:
1. Cast iron
which is used in industrial and constructional projects.
2- Steel, which has many uses.
Of course, steel products are imported into Yemen
today in increasing volume.
Let me add here that no economy can really develop
if it does not include heavy industries such as iron factories. The reason
is that this fatory can then propduce materials that go into the production
of many other products which have high value added.
It is in this light that I call on our entrepreneurs
to take advantage of the raw material that is available in large quantities
in our country. This can also serve as the base for other industries. The
government must also support these endeavors because of the added employment
value they generate.
Be
Our Guest
By
Riad al Khouri
The Jordanian interior minister's statement last
year that the number of foreign workers in Jordan is equal to the number
of Jordanians in the country's domestic work force should come as no surprise.
Myriad Egyptians and others resident in Jordan, including some Yemenis,
are simply doing the jobs Jordanians don't want, a labor market pattern
familiar in the Arab world. Traditionally, these "guest workers"
from Arab states have been welcome in Amman. The minister talked about
Jordan's usual "openness" with regard to Arab visitors. He added
however that Jordan would apply existing laws it had not fully enforced
in the past to crack down on illegal workers. However, he insisted that
Jordan will "stick to labor-exchange agreements" with other countries
and "preserve the rights" of legal workers.
Fair enough: Jordanian rules in this regard are
reasonable, and their application was also and continues to be tempered
politically. Jordan has always been tolerant when it comes to issues which
do not impinge directly on its national security, and I predict that this
time was no exception: the kingdom's Arab guests -- and many of its foreign
ones as well Ð are still largely be here months after the crisis broke.
If on the other hand, members of the non-Jordanian Arab workforce of Amman
started to riot to protest Jordan's relations with a non-Arab state such
as, say, Ruritania, they would be expelled before you could say "normalization."
The state's message to non-Jordanians is clear: stay away from political
issues; otherwise, if you don't actually commit a felony, be our guest.
Of course that was a lot easier to say when the economy was booming a decade
or two ago, and unemployment was not an issue. The trick of course is to
bring down unemployment; once that happens, a lot of the headaches regarding
guest workers will disappear.
Now for the tough part: commenting on Jordanian
unemployment and the guest worker issue, the prime minister said last year
that "bold measures" to combat poverty and unemployment among Jordanians
would be taken, and that work would begin to introduce a minimum wage.
Alas, this tune is now being played again in Amman, and talk of a minimum
wage has surfaced again during the past few days. If this happens in an
unemployment crisis like Jordan's present one, look out. Such a measure
would be disastrous if enforced -- though it would probably be unenforceable.
Most foreigners in Jordan work for far lower wages than Jordanians, thus
making businesses run. An argument can be made for Jordan to abandon its
cheap-labor economic model, but this will mean massive restructuring, retraining,
and retrenchment in the labor market, an elsewhere in the economy. Meanwhile
the minimum wage idea is virtually impossible in a country wallowing in
economic crisis. Once the economy picks up, through a combination of the
right exogenous factors (comprehensive regional peace) and an internal
attempt to improve the investment climate (to a considerable extent a function
of the Jordanian government's deregulation of the economy) measures like
a minimum wage will have a chance. Whether one should be imposed or not
is another question: my point is that it would be impossible to apply under
the present circumstances. Till annual GNP growth goes back to the seven
percent or so which will allow new entrants to the labor market to be absorbed,
a minimum wage applied to Jordan is a bit like prescribing sophisticated
organic diets to somebody who is in a coma: he has to be revived first
before he can get the fancy medicine. Until then, Jordan and other Arab
countries should concentrate more on economic liberalization than on interference
with markets, including those for labor.
I say "other Arab countries" because the
simultaneous existence of unemployment and guest workers is also present
elsewhere in the region. Take for example Saudi Arabia, where that country's
interior minister recently said last year that the country was paying a
"high price" for foreign workers and urged Saudis not to shun any
job offered to them. The minister, Prince Nayef bin Abdelaziz, told a meeting
of Saudi businessmen then that the kingdom was taking steps to ensure more
Saudis take up jobs currently held by foreigners and said authorities may
soon announce new measures to boost the employment of nationals. "We
appreciate those who come to our country and work with us. But, of course,
we pay a price for those who come from abroad and it is a very high price,"
the minister said. He expressed the hope that Saudi nationals would work
in all fields and not shun any job, and explained that if Saudis turned
down those jobs, non-Saudis must take them. Saudi Arabia is eager to replace
many of its foreign workers Ð still including some Yemenis -- with
its nationals. The government has told private firms employing more than
twenty people to increase their Saudi staff by five percent a year. In
my opinion, this would be as unenforceable as a Jordanian minimum wage
under the present circumstances. With the Saudi economy still largely dependent
on oil, and with petroleum prices stagnating badly, such measures may be
difficult to take. Nevertheless, when it comes to expelling non-Saudis,
Saudi Arabia has proved a lot tougher than Jordan, especially over the
past few months.
The lesson which has yet to be learned by many
government officials in the Arab world is that interference with markets
is tricky and should be done rarely and very carefully. Minimum wages and
statutory employment of nationals are steps which can be undertaken only
under certain circumstances, preferably accompanied by other measures which
would ease economic distortions instead of aggravating them. Otherwise,
the rule must be to leave markets alone: whether in Jordan, Saudi Arabia,
or elsewhere, the government's role in the economy has to shrink, and not
to expand through more regulation.
|