50 - December 9 thru December 15, 2002,
Vol XII

Lies
of the 'Puritans'
COMMON SENSE
By Hassan Al-Haifi
The puritanical sects that took on many names and covers, spread throughout
the Moslem World, under a loosely tied network, with icons of the movement
rapidly catching media attention. The spread and prestige achieved by these
various dubious institutions that emerged gradually began to take on the
image as being representative of Islamic thought and doctrine.
Furthermore they took on the shape of political movements in the various
states that made up the Moslem World, taking full advantage of whatever
marginal political freedoms were made available in these states. In many
areas, they also took on a paramilitary presence, with established training
grounds and with their icons roaming around the country with heavily armed
escorts.
Once these puritanical institutions established firm grounds in any
country, they began to forcefully put their will upon the Moslems of these
countries demanding that only their views on all matters of religion be
accepted by all, and anyone who refuses shall be considered as a heathen
or a heretic. Thus another factor that worked against the development of
the other rational, traditional Psalmists, who painstakingly sought to
protect what they could of the tolerance and compassion which Islam truly
conveyed. It is noteworthy to mention that the major factors that helped
these puritanical sects gain rapid momentum over the last three decades
were as follows:
• Widespread illiteracy and ignorance among most of the populations
of the Moslem World and the inability of the prevailing regimes in these
states to provide widespread educational and other social services to the
populations of these states.
• The substantial funding that the propagators and organizers of these
institutions had access to, most of which came from the followers of these
puritanical sects in some of the rich Gulf States.
• The seemingly innocent and excessive religious character of these
movements appealed to innocent followers of Islam, who could not characterize
these movements properly. Many Moslems saw in the active excessive adherence
portrayed by these groups as more attractive to the spread of vice and
corruption that prevailed in many Moslem states, which faithful Moslems
saw as rightly being anathema to Islam.
• The ample media sensations created by the propagators of these puritanical,
so called orthodox sects.
• Their tight net organizational and clandestine nature of their activities,
which lacked any transparency, and thus were not subject to questioning
even by the mass constituencies that have fallen under these movements.
• The ability of the followers of these creeds to convey to the United
States and other Western allies that they can guarantee victory against
Communism. This led to substantial clandestine military as well as tactical
support for these movements, in areas like Afghanistan, Bosnia and Central
Asia.
• The tendency of some regimes in the Moslem World to ally themselves
politically with these movements, with a mutual tacit laisse-faire attitude
of the regime and the proponents of these movements, as long as each stayed
within agreed lines limiting the attacks against the respective side. The
Sudan was one of the first to declare itself free from such clandestine
political arrangement.
There are many other reasons why these movements began to take on the
position of the leading Psalmists in the Moslem states, but it is clear
that these movements have done great harm to the image of Islam and to
the future hopes of the Moslem Nation. It is the challenge of trying to
offset all this damage that has been caused that true Moslem activists
must work to achieve, if Islam is to regain its true face in the world
as a creed that insists on peace and human rights for all citizens of the
world and values human life and works to spread welfare and prosperity
for all human beings.
Muslims
can adapt to the new century
BY JUDITH BROWN
I would like to reply to the article in this week's Yemen Times by
an American, Dr. Arthur Bellinzoni, in which he asks the question, "Can
Muslims adapt to the 21st Century?" (Issue 43).
He states, inaccurately, that Jewish and Christian fundamentalism are
things of the past, and the only fundamentalism we have to worry about
is Islam.
Oh, no, Dr. Bellinzoni, you are just looking at things from your own
very one-sided view. Jewish fundamentalism is alive and well, as I and
many European friends have witnessed when we see the way settlers behave
in the Arab territories that Israel occupies, killing, torturing, dispossessing
Arabs, all with the excuse that "God gave them this land".
Let's get it straight. Their God told them they could have the land
providing they looked after the land and the people of it, but instead
they choose to humiliate Arabs who are prepared to share the land with
them. This type of Jew destroys Arab lives and the land they live on. This
is not true Judaism which is firmly based on a system of justice.
American Christian fundamentalists on the other hand think that if
"The Promised Land" is fully occupied by Jews, then there will be
another Messiah who will come down and convert the whole world to Christianity.
They use the far from perfect American democratic system to tie the
hands of the political leaders forcing them to support the truly evil regime
in Israel, all in the name of their God.
This does not mean that Jews and Christians are inherently wicked.
Here in the UK and also in Israel there are many organizations where Jews,
Muslims, Christians and others work together respectfully for peace. We
are the ones who are not fundamentalists.
I have many Muslim friends in Yemen, they are like sisters to me. The
thoughtful love and consideration which they unfailingly demonstrate to
me, a non-Muslim, proves that they are far from fundamentalist, and I can
assure you they are the vast majority.
Dr. Bellinzoni, over many years I have worked closely with Muslims
and I do not find them less progressive than my British and American friends
and relatives. I do not find them less able to adapt to this century.
It is a sign of your own racism and religious prejudice that you think
so. All people, of all races and religions, are the same mix of good and
bad. Muslims react against the West because our nations vilify them and
arrogantly act as if their land and resources are ours, not because of
religious fervor.
Until you and those like you realize that, there will be no peace in
the world. It is you who have to adapt to reality of the times we live
in, not Muslims.
A
view of Yemen from an English home
BY JANET WATSON
As a child, I used to watch a television series called Dr Who. Dr Who
had a tardis - a large box which resembled a police telephone box from
the outside, but which from the inside was the size of a spaceship. This
machine took him across dimensions of time and space instantly.
Now, as I sit in my English kitchen, looking at my postcards from Yemen,
I long for a tardis. To be able to get up and walk into Sug al-Bagar or
Bab al-Yaman or Bab Shu'ub. Maybe for a weekend, or maybe just for an afternoon's
qat chew, or an evening with my Yemeni women friends watching the Syrian
sahrah. The cards on the wall make San'a seem so close, so real. A telephone
call so clear, I could be calling my neighbor.
I left Yemen some time ago after spending almost two years in the country.
The ease with which I stepped on to the plane to London belied the vast
difference between my life in Yemen and my life in England. In England
I ride a bicycle; my clothes are different; the weather is colder; I work
in an office; I teach Arabic to undergraduate students; I shop in supermarkets;
the bread, a symbol of life, is wrapped in plastic.
In Yemen I walk almost everywhere; I climb hundreds of stairs a week
to visit friends; I do not have to answer e-mails; I rarely sit on my own;
the bread, a symbol of life, is fresh.
Above all, in England, it is the fresh spontaneity of Yemen that I
miss. I miss the daily contact with my women friends. I miss the control
I have over my life. People often speak about how difficult and frustrating
life can be in the Middle East. I think I know what they mean, but it is
not my experience. It is in England where time is master that time is wasted,
through the very routine of the country, the strict office hours, the timetables,
the meetings, the energy-sapping appointments, the plastic wrappings.
In Yemen, the day stretches miraculously from the fresh, sharp light
of early morning to the comforting warmth of late evening. I need no means
to count the time in Yemen. Time is not my master here. The bread, reflecting
life, is fresh.
Sketched
Opinion

|