18 - April 30th thru May 6th 2001,
Vol XI
As
Government Program Heralds
More Suffering for People
and Battle between Islah and GPC over Education
Mohammed Hatem Al-Qadhi
Yemen Times
The Cabinet approved on Tuesday the overall program that would be presented
to the parliament for final approval very soon. The program derives its
main goals from the program of the ruling party, GPC, and the speech of
President Ali Abdullah Saleh to the new government after its members were
sworn in. On these broad lines the government has defined its responsibilities.
The program focuses on the continuation of the policies of economic,
administrative, and financial reforms which have conducted with the help
of World Bank and IMF since 1995. It also highlights the judiciary, social
affairs and reforming a number of legislations and laws, as well as enhancing
decentralization.
It aims at fighting corruption, reforming civil services, promoting
non-oil resources, curbing problems of water shortage, population, in addition
to the electoral system, amending election laws, local governance and administrative
divisions of the country into electoral constituencies.
The five main concerns of the new government, formed on April 4, are
administrative reform in the civil service, human development, economic,
social and investment development, democracy promotion and expansion of
public participation, and finally reform of judicial system and human rights
concerns.
The program says the government is serious about the reform of the
civil service sector, putting limits to dual and phantom job carriers on
government payrolls and enacting the Pension Law.
The new government seems to be serious about unification of the education
system, putting into practice the law of education which was invalidated
in 1990.
This law abolishes the scholastic institutes being sponsored by the
Islamic party, Islah. In addition, it prioritizes technical and vocational
education as well as higher studies. It also gives women more room in education
in an attempt to minimize illiteracy. The rate among them is now over 80%.
It also targets the social care authorities to decrease the poverty rate
(now over 30%) and put an end to begging. It also intends to improve tourism,
culture, environment, by establishing a fund for cultural development.
In the arena of economic and monetary reforms, the program assures
that the government will go ahead with the implementation of the reform,
controlling the budget deficit and reducing expenses. It will also lift
subsidies on diesel, petrol and other services which, of course, would
accelerate people's sufferings. It pledges to conduct financial and banking
reforms and work hard to establish a stock market in the country.
The government will implement a five-year plan with the aim of achieving
growth between 5%-5.5% in the national gross production during the years
2001-2002. For this, the government will encourage the private sector to
invest in services like water, roads, electricity and communications. As
well as agricultural manufacturing like mango, wool, dates ,and coffee,
and minimizing the planting of qat. It intends to build 318 dams at YR
4 billion, giving attention to the fishing sector.
At the industrial level, the government intends to adopt and conduct
a strategy to develop industry and plan for establishing of huge manufacturing
complexes in Aden, Hodeidah, and Mukala. It promises to continue efforts
to join the World Trade Organization as well as gatherings with similar
goals. It will also, according to its program, enhance oil exploration
in different areas, giving more attention to gas and its exploitation.
It confirms that it will improve the electrical situation, increasing
telephone users to 150,000, mobile phone users 200% and internet users
100% during the coming year.
For the first time in the history of any government, the new government
singles out in its program two chapters; one is for civil society and human
rights and the other for fighting corruption.
It is a good sign that it acknowledges the horror of corruption and
reveals that with democracy and free expressions, joint ventures by all
people can be formed to eradicate corruption. Local councils and parliaments
can help significantly in this regard. " It is not possible to uproot
corruption in a two-year time", the program reads. However, it says
this time should initiate the campaign against this virus and all people
support it.
It is expected that the government's program will be approved easily
as the GPC enjoys a majority in the parliament. However, the Islah caucus
will oppose most of the program's articles, mainly those related to education
and economic conditions of the rank and file.
The coming few days will see a heated debate over the question of education
unification between Islah and GPC as Islah thinks this targets itself.
It heralds a battle between them which might end their age-old strategic
coalition which was hit during the local election.
Islah might mobilize the opposition and public opinion against the
program which will add fuel to the fire and thus worsen the people's living
standards. The question now is: will the government of Mr. Abdulqader Bajamal
be able to face all these problems and put its program into practice, thus
creating a link between what is said and done?
Dr.
Abdulrahman Ba Fadhel:
"We always argue how
development goes positive meanwhile individual income goes down (negatively)"
The
new government includes for the first time 23 new Ministers, with 17 ousted
Ministers. Also creation of new ministries as well as unification of others.
We appreciate new blood in the government body that will end a known diplomatic
proverb that says formation of Yemen Governments is only change of seats.
The government is unfortunately headed by an Ex. Minister, who participated
already in many governments; including the best GPC government headed by
independent strong character, with deep administrative, economic culture
namely Dr. Faraj Bin Ghanem, which didn't continue for long, (six months
only). This government is for two Years minus one quarter, which will be
allocated for coming parliamentary and local elections as well.
The program of this government is not new. It will surely continue
the preceding one where this Prime Minister was Pioneer of preceding government
program; that is why we will oppose this government, and will not vote
in its favor.
The program in reality, irrespective of what the government claims,
will be as follows;
1- Continuation of World Bank Program in two fields:
i) Elimination of claimed subsidy of Gasoline with increase
in price by not less than 40%. This will lead automatically to transport
and bread price increase, as Gasoline plays a major role in these two commodities.
This in return will lead to increase in all fields. Gasoline will affect
agriculture. Most farmers will abandon their job which means more dependence
on US wheat and wheat flower!!
ii) The government claims always even the preceding one, that
development in Yemen approached 7% which didn't happen even in US and Europe.
We always argue how development goes positive meanwhile individual income
goes down (negatively). Increase in all services including electricity,
telephone, gas and water without even notifying people or at least legist
power in Parliament.
iii) Privatization of public sector mainly Aden refinery, cement
factories, Medicine corporation among others. We have been in England last
month, namely in Adam Smith Institute (ADI), which is Excellent, and unique
in its activities among which is privatization with large experience practiced
a long with British privatization Process Since the 80's.
The keys and main tools that lead to large success there, are not available
in our country!! So here it will be an absolute failure. These tools which
we learned are the following:
1- transparency which is fully unavailable in Yemen.
2- Competitively in the same field of privatization which we
lack in Yemen.
3- Laws and Regulations to guarantee good service and competitive
prices. Independent Body with full authority to look for interest of both
consumer and producer, that we absolutely do not have. Laws in Yemen in
general are not applied by consecutive governments and no guarantee can
be expected, to protect consumer interest, but for producer is always guaranteed.
More over where and how the independent body will be formed.
As an example British Airways Assets evaluated by 300 million pound,
sold with 900 million pound in shares !! while in Yemen assets due to government
corruption will be sold with even less than half of their value.
4- Privatization philosophy is based on shares to be distributed
among citizens, in a way that no one can have more than 15% from abroad
as it happed in British Airways. Not only that, but also, Workers and Employee
should be in the picture during the whole process of privatization. More
over they have to be share holders with at least 5% free shares for them
as a motive. The Preceding government refused to put even the parliament
in the picture !!
5- Sharing process should be governed by the Bourse, where Yemen
has no bourse at all.
6-Finally independent, transparent, judicial power which in
Yemen is still lagging behind.
For all reasons above (ADI) should be proud of British Privatization
that lead to employment, lowering prices of services, with better quality,
and large some of money to feed the treasury. We hope ADI will pay a visit
to Yemen to see our situation. If privatization is needed it is the Management
only, where elite staff is highly corrupted, in public sector. Privatization
of Public sector, will lead to increase in no employment, degradation in
services, and high prices at the same time.
Last word for World Bank carrying, with deep thanks, reforms in Yemen.
We feel strongly, all members in the Parliament, that without Administrative
reforms, all its efforts will collapse.
Evidence is what Mr. Andersud (WB representative) told us in his last
visit of farewell to Parliament heads of caucus with Finance Committee
as well. He submitted a report to us stressing that in Yemen:
(1) Unemployment increases.
(2) Poverty increases.
(3) Oil revenue decreases.
(4) Water Supply decreases.
In other terms WB program failed in Yemen. Briefly Speaking with subsidies,
elimination + increase in services prices (water, telephone, electricity
etc..) + New taxes (income, real state, selling tax, etc,.) + all this
against individual income decreasing + High corruption rate, all will lead
to a disaster of which the WB is highly responsible. We always say that
Yemen is not Europe. And what frighten us more, that severe economic situation
might lead to our democracy collapse, as people say today what is the use
of freedom of expression while famine is spreading.
Our main distinguished affair in the region is DEMOCRACY, and human
rights, and freedom of expression. If it goes due to Economic failure the
WB will be surely guilty and responsible.
Refugees'
Tragedies & Continues Sufferings Constitute A Real Challenge to Human
Rights & Dignity
Prepared by Abdulkadir M.
Al-Ariki
Environment / Development Specialist
There is every likelihood that one day any of us could face the tragedy
of being a refugee/forced immigrant, since nowadays no one has immunity
against it, finding oneself without a home, a country and without dignity.
This is the reality that millions and millions of human beings are
facing today. The plight of being transformed into refugee/displaced persons
who depend totally on others benevolence/charity offerings for their day
to day survival/livelihood.
Why does this happened in the so called civilized world? This is occurring
due to many factors such as the followings:
- Living in a world of inequality which
continuously generates more and more poverty and poor people amidst overgrowing
wealth and opulence for few groups/individuals. A few nations are controlling
more than 80% of the world's productive resources and assets. This is a
world of unequals: 20% extraordinary very rich in contrast with 20% totally
deprived people living under abject poverty conditions compelled to live
in hunger, fear of starvation, social injustice, discrimination, lack of
access to assets, to opportunity of socio-economic justice or lack of protection
from unexpected events and disasters. Most are man-made, plus fear of wars
and of persecution. Such world naturally produces a large number of forced
immigrants, and refugees/displaced persons each year. Hence, without taking
an effective global/national/regional actions to alleviate or reduce the
above mentioned factors and others, it will be impossible to avoid the
forced immigrants, refugees or displaced persons.
Accordingly, all nations, mainly the developed countries and empowered
rich people have to seriously, address this real human rights challenge
and violations by adopting measures and actions necessary for realizing
a balanced development. This should be directed at empowering the poor
people and nations through a pro-poor, sustainable development policy.
This would include a real and balanced implementation of the Universal
Human Rights, Laws, Conventions and Declarations before, during and after
the human tragedy.
Accordingly, there is an increasing need to review the definitions
of: a refugee, a displaced Person, or a Forced Immigrant.
-Key players are UNHCR, country of origin,
host country and the refugees.
Since the mid of 1990, a strong pressure and support groups have been
coordinating the aid/assistance to refugees and displaced persons. They
have targeted poor people in the process of management and evaluation of
humanitarian aid/assistance. And it is in this context that UNHCR presented
itself as one of the excellent organizations committed to accelerating
such participation processes. (See "Participatory Evaluation of the
Humanitarian Aids" and "UNHCR opens up its evaluation reports to
public scrutinity and invites NGO participation in evaluation missions",
1999). These have to be based on real transparency and accountability of
managing the humanitarian aid, which will be verified practically by the
new unit established in 1999, which is the "Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Section, directly accountable to High Commissioner of Refugee Affairs Assistant".
Accordingly, we hope that the process of humanitarian and relief assistance
should be assessed more than merely by focusing on the amount of aid given
to the powerless refugees, specially for those pouring into poor developing
countries.
Secondly, the refugees have to be given the right of participation
in articulating and managing their needs. This gives the impact of aid
more importance rather than focusing on its superficial results or contents.
Thirdly, we must always remember that we are talking about people...individuals
who, given the chance, have the potential to make significant contributions
to the world around them. But in order to achieve their potential, they
need and deserve to live a decent life as human beings. They need to have
all of the rights, dignity and aspirations, including their protection
from aggressive attitude and actions mainly from assistance/aid providers
and host countries. Particularly the managers of health care providers
should exhibit decency, sensibility and public relation skills in terms
of human rights, dignity. They should also have substantial awareness in
respect of refugees' socio-economic, psychological, emotional and mental
conditions. All parties concerned have to fight the atrocities inflicted
on the refugees in the context of their total dependence on charity and
outsiders for their daily basic needs. Every one should realize that this
type of life is poisonous and will lead to creating and developing what
is known as "dependence culture". In other words, they will become
less motivated and continuously expect others to provide for them all the
basic needs to survive a decent livelihood as respected human beings, including
the right to work and health services.
- Refugees/Displaced Persons in least Developed
Countries: These countries, such as Yemen, Kenya, Ethiopia, and Sudan are
bearing much socio-cultural burden and they cannot afford to fulfill all
duties and responsibilities required from host countries of refugees. This
is because they themselves are suffering from acute poverty and unemployment
to the tune of 50%, 60%. Hence, the refugees are facing further hardships
ranging from access to appropriate health services, malnutrition, and over-crowded
housing to lack of education and income-generating opportunities. As the
director of Sana'a Refugee Health Center (ICD) stated recently (YT march
19, 2001), refugees need jobs, good housing, food, education, security
and empowerment in order to attain good health. This is not easy in Yemen
because so many Yemenis are poor themselves. However, she didn't offer
any suggestions or solutions to ease/solve urban refugees suffering in
Yemen. Further more it is not totally true that the RHC (ICD) people are
offering fair health services to every one, irrespective of their ethnic
background. At least for cancergeonic, cardiac and other similar patients
who need continuos treatment and costy medicines. If the urban patient
doesn't have the refugee card and if he/she is a Somali of Yemeni origin
the problem is still more serious. Some staff of UNHCR office in Sana'a
justified the ICD refusal to treat refugee patients without a card even
if they have been registered officially for more than three years. Most
of them are women and children who stand waiting in front of the UNHCR
office daily. This creates despair and more sufferings, specially for refugee
women who keep hoping that the program of issuing their identification
card will start soon as assured by the UNHCR resident representative in
Yemen, (YT - February 5th 2001). More than 77% of the registered refugees
constitute Urban Refugee about 55% of whom are living in Sana'a, excluding
another 100,000 of them who are still unregistered. Most of these are the
newly arrived Somali refugees. Truly speaking, the Yemen people and government
generously hosted the Somali refugees and are bearing a substantial socio-cultural
costs on account of them without receiving appropriate aid and assistance
as has been promised by regional and international organizations.
In order to alleviate the above-mentioned problems and suffering
of refugees living in least developed countries, such as Yemen, the following
actions and alternatives maybe taken:
- The international agencies concerned
have to provide urgently, the necessary technical, financial, socio-economic
aid and assistance to help poor and least developed countries in order
to cope with these huge number of refugees pouring mainly into Yemen and
surrounding neighboring countries.
- More qualified, special health centers,
run by local, regional and international NGOs are needed. The refugees
should be encouraged to participate actively in the process of management
and evaluation of humanitarian assistance operations as has been affirmed
and encouraged by all donors and concerned organizations including UNHCR.
- The donors, the agencies and humanitarian
organization concerned have to assist the refugees, mainly urban ones,
in providing income-generating micro credit facilities necessary for financing
small enterprises/works for improving their precarious standard of living.
- Alternatively, in order to alleviate
the socio-economic burdens of the poor countries caused by hosting these
huge number of refugees, the majority of whom are vulnerable groups being
victims of war (mostly Somalis), they should have the right to be resettled
in the developed countries. Presently the origin countries such as Somalia
are still unstable and suffering.
|