24 - June 12th thru June 18th 2000,
Vol X

Dr.
Mohamed Abdulgabbar Sallam at the Press Freedom Seminar:
"Yemen Times is the Only
Institutionalized Newspaper in Yemen"
Jalal Al-Sharaabi
Yemen Times
The conference on Press Freedom started with a speech on the present
and future prospects of the Yemeni Press by Mr. Abdulwahhab Al-Rawhani,
Member of Parliament and Chairman of the Information Committee of the Parliament.
He emphasized the strong link between Yemeni unity and democracy and Freedom
of the Press in Yemen. As he said, "Unity and democracy came to open
up new and wide horizons for freedom of expression and press in an unprecedented
manner for politicians and media people. Despite the little experience
in implementing democracy and freedom of the press, like other countries
in the Arab region, Yemen was able to implement radical changes in favor
of improving Press Freedom. This was due to the fact that Journalists and
Press in general are getting great attention from President Ali Abdullah
Saleh. This was evident also because democracy and freedom in all its forms
are currently deeply rooted in the Yemeni constitution."Mr. Al-Rawhani
indicated that the seminar was a great occasion to expand the journalism-related
issues. Well-trained and educated journalists in government offices before
unity constituted only 20% of the journalists, while the remaining 80%
depended on their experience."On the present situations relating to the
Press in Yemen he said that the Ministry of Information's latest figures
show that there are currently 225 publications, of which 128 have permissions.
There are 26 publications managed by the government while there are 24
publications by public related committees and establishments. On the other
hand, there are more than 36 newspapers issued by political parties and
party-oriented organizations. Among these newspapers, 3 are daily (governmental),
79 are weekly, 68 monthly, 23 seasonal, and 7 periodical.
Al-Rawhani raised the question regarding how the newspaper-reading
population, which is no more than 5% of the whole population, would interact
and benefit from this large number of newspapers. He brought about shocking
statistics showing that the most prominent newspapers (governmental) are
the least to distribute their issues in Aden. The newspaper that had the
least circulation in Aden was ironically the official newspaper of the
government. It only circulated 200 copies in the whole city. On the other
hand,the circulation of Al-Ayyam newspaper for example,exceeded 11,000
copies. The same applies for Arab and foreign newspapers, as they distribute
more than 93,000 copies, 84% of them being read by the public.
In his conclusion, he indicated that the average Yemeni reader looks
to important news, the news that is interesting, accurate, and unbiased.
This, in itself, is not available in very many Yemeni newspapers.
Mr. Al-Rawhani gave an example of the exaggeration and inaccuracy in
news items by Yemeni newspapers and expressed his disappointment in the
fact that only two newspapers reported the story of Mohamed Adem in an
accurate and unexaggerated manner. It was later mentioned by Walid Al-Saqqaf,
that Yemen Times was one of them. He repeatedly explained that the Yemeni
"Yellow" newspapers are below the international standard in almost
all aspects and should try to rise to the expected level of quality of
these newspapers.
He concluded his statement by explaining the appropriate measures to
be taken to raise the standard of Yemeni newspapers. These measures include
benefiting from Arab and regional experiences of other prominent newspapers
in the region, emphasizing accuracy which should be prioritized, and imparting
appropriate training to raise the professional competence of journalists.
Afterwards, Mr. Walid Abdulaiz Al-Saqqaf, Chief Editor of Yemen Times
gave a speech about the challenges facing the private press enterprise.
In his speech, he started by responding to Mr. Al-Rawhani by claiming that
it is impossible for Yemeni newspapers with their limited financial and
human resources to rise to the level of international standards. He explained
that this applies to all the institutions in Yemen, including the media
consisting of the radio and Television. "We cannot expect a newspaper
such as Al-Wahdawi to rise to the level of "Roasalyousif" while
Sanaa TV Channel cannot rise to the level of MBC."
Later Mr. Walid continued by listing the obstacles faced by the private
press. "First we should always begin with the financial resources. Any
newspaper needs financing to continue and continue strongly. Unless it
develops its own resources, it cannot continue successfully." He gave
Yemen Times as an example of a newspaper that neither depends on foreign
nor on local funding. It only depends on its own financial resources through
advertisements. YT developed an efficient and strong commercial based self-financing
mechanism that enables it to strengthen its capacity building mechanisms
and raise its quality every year. According to Mr. Saqqaf, another obstacle
is the lack of information, as Yemen is among the countries that is not
used to holding press conferences and issuing press releases frequently.
Until this very moment, there is yet no mechanism to assign quick coverage
to events such as kidnappings, disasters, and other eventualities, while
there are always news items about new governmental projects, accomplishments,
inaugurations, etc. This is not true journalism. This obviously encourages
private newspapers to seek alternative sources of information, which sometimes
are inaccurate, resulting in publication of exaggerated information, or
even misinformation.
"The lack of appropriate and world standard printing units in Yemen
is a further challenge for private newspapers." Said Mr. Saqqaf. "
The limited financing of these establishments makes it difficult for them
to obtain printing units for their newspapers. Hence, such newspapers have
to print their issues in a separate printing house, some of which are owned
by the government. This causes delay and degrades overall quality of the
newspaper. This is not a challenge that can be overcome by efforts of the
newspapers alone, but can be combated by joint efforts by the government
by providing loans and facilities for these newspapers to obtain their
own printing units, and by increasing the overall quality of service of
available printing houses.
Another challenge that Mr. Saqqaf identified was the honesty, integrity,
and total independence. It is not easy for a newspaper to be unbiased and
independent in all sectors all the time, as there are several factors that
push it towards one side or the other. According to press analysts, the
most successful newspapers, throughout modern history, were the independent
and honest newspapers reporting news without any alteration, making it
a continuously trustworthy source of information.
Then he described how Yemen Times is a newspaper that has gone through
many difficult times because of its strong and unbiased stand towards national
issues. This resulted in the harassment of the newspaper during several
stages of its history. Until today, Yemen Times continues to publish accurate
and unbiased articles without thinking of the consequence. Hence, it has
gained the respect of the readers and has become more popular and trustworthy
than any other Yemeni newspaper in English." He added that the most
important constraint behind the hesitation of some writers to write bold
and courageous articles, even if based on correct information, is the judicial
constraints that limit authentic news and views from being published.
In his concluding statement, Chief Editor of YT, Walid Al-Saqqaf expressed
the hope in that the last and most important challenge of finding qualified,
professional, and skillful employees will be met in future with the help
of the Faculty of Information, Sanaa University. He explained that for
Yemen Times, finding appropriately trained journalists is even more difficult
because it requires proficiency in English . The human resources in this
field are extremely inadequate, and need development through various activities.
Mr. Saqqaf finally surprised the participants by breaking news of a workshop
that YT is planning to organize during the summer in cooperation with JEMSTONE.
The last speaker in the seminar was Mr. Mohamed Yahya Al-Sabri, GM
of the Information Committee of Sanaa University. He gave a speech about
the factors influencing party-oriented newspapers in Yemen.
Mr. Sabri said, "I believe we cannot understand the problems of
the party-oriented press without understanding the concepts of the freedom
of press. The freedom of press could only be achieved by presenting the
news to the reader in an accurate, independent, and unbiased matter. Unfortunately,
we in Yemen, do not have this mentality. Most party-oriented press only
present half of the truth, and exaggerates most of the time just to adjust
the news items to suit their political party's interest."
Mr. Sabri indicated that the main factors behind the failure of party-oriented
newspapers to get the truth of the public is their biased reporting and
the inaccurate information provided. He summarized the factors under three
headings: judicial factors, administrative and political factors, and party-oriented
factors. All these factors, each in its own way, affect the credibility
of the news items published, and create less overall trust in readers minds
about the true dimensions of the news items.
Regarding the judicial constraints, Mr. Sabri explained that the limits
that the journalist or writer should not exceed are not well defined. This
is the major reason behind the award of prison sentences to journalists
and closure of newspapers. Another factor is the double standard and discriminatory
treatment to governmental newspapers that are defaming other newspapers
and escaping without punishment, while other papers are prosecuted. This
significantly limits the freedom of the writer, especially of party-oriented
newspapers.
The political factors are imposed by the involvement of Ministry of
Information in the internal affairs of other newspapers, which sometimes
results in the closure of these newspapers.
The party-oriented factors are the strongest reason for the distrust
of the readers as it forces the writer to write articles in a biased manner
usually in the interest of the party ignoring all the others. This causes
the readership to decrease or be limited to those having the political
affiliation to the party in question.
Mr. Sabri concluded that apart from all these factors, party-oriented
newspapers are also affected by the low level of professionalism in their
staff in terms of skills of journalism. This results in the downfall in
the professional level the party-oriented newspapers causing them to be
among the least credible newspapers, not in Yemen alone, but in a global
context.
After all the speeches were over, the Dean of the faculty thanked the
participants and added that "10 years is not a short period. It may
be a short period in a global sense, but for Yemen it is quite a long period
in which we have experienced a lot and learned a lot.
We have always dreamed about unity, and now that we are living in its
10th year, we realize the fruits it has given us, among which is the freedom
of expression."
Then Dr. Mohamed Abdulgabbar Sallam, a prominent figure in the faculty,
and the Chief Editor of the "Kalima" newspaper concluded the proceedings
by suggesting about a key reason for the current situation of the press
in Yemen. "If we are talking about institutionalized press in Yemen
in both its private and party-oriented sectors, there is only one single
and sole newspaper in the whole country which is institutionalized, and
that is Yemen Times. Unfortunately, the newspapers today are no more than
shop-like newspapers that lack the true sense of journalism. Journalism
in the sixties and seventies was in its peak and in its most professional
excellence, despite the small staff they had. Today, the large number and
low quality of services provided shows the true level of journalism in
Yemen. It means that journalism in Yemen is truly in an extremely low level."At
the end of the seminar, the participants and a number of teachers in the
university, including Dr. Sallam0 received honorary certificates for their
active role in the event and in various other activities of the faculty.
Power
Coflict in Yemen
Talking on democracy in the Arab world sometimes assumes a theoretically
complex dimension, making the concept of democracy a bit problematic. The
question is how we can guarantee that the government is run under supervision
and knowledge of the majority. The PGC has proved that it had won a narrow
majority and from the beginning it started looking for alliances and managed
to ally itself to Al-Haq party. What we are talking about is a real popular
majority. The political problem of Yemen is that the rule was characterized
by conflict of elites representing, regional , ethnical or tribal minorities
while the popular majority remained marginalized and far away. Since the
Immamite rule the right to government was confined to an ethnical minority,
and even within that context there was a factional or certain tribal forces
that spread their control and thus the rule was rendered into a narrower
circle. This conflict remained active even during the post-unification
phase. The regional minority groups indulged into strife, conflict and
competition over the assumption of power without giving attention or concern
for the majority opinion. The sources of power are controlled by a certain
tribe, a certain group here or there, still this group continues in its
conflict. It makes no difference whether this is in the southern part or
in the northern part of the country. What is apparent is that the voice
of majority is inaudible in this context. To settle the issue of authority
in Yemen, I think one should take the following points into account:
The right of the people's majority. No doubt, the republican system
has granted equal opportunity to all, which is a positive sign. But, the
major tools of authority still continue to remain in the hands of a limited
tribal regional sect. The morals of the ruler are a decisive factor for
getting a good governance. Let us take the example of president Clifton's
involvement in the sex scandal and how he acted to get out of the accusations.
The American example is a significant point to be taken into account when
dealing with authority . Wasn't it in the hands of president Clinton to
put the investigating officer or who accused him of adultery in jail? If
we deeply analyze the issue we can see that he did not have the power to
do such a thing in a democratic system. To use the army against the Congress
in the context is impossible. Such a sort of thinking is irrational too.
It is more important to deal with the issues of wealth, power and authority.
Since wealth remains determinant of power in the hands of the authority,
it is not possible to tame the authority or subjugate it to law. Then,
how are we going to solve this issue? If we take the example of the U.S.
we can clearly see the use of tools to subdue to subdue others is not seen
in US administration. When I speak about uprightness of power I wager on
morals of the ruler and nevertheless it is of no avail to bet on morals
of those in power because in its very nature it tempts the ruler to injustice.
The sound path is that the authority should not enjoy monopoly of or monopoly
of wealth. If we don't settle this issue, then these ideas will remain
only slogans and there would be impossible to achieve distribution of power.
The only available path for us is therefore to struggle to transform elections
to a real mechanism for peaceful transfer of power. Such mechanism will
put the authority in the hands of the majority. No region or regions will
claim the right to steer the state at the expense of the popular majority.
The more important thing is what kind of role the opposition party should
practically play? The practical way lies first in embodiment of these meanings
within the parties and their organizational conditions. To cooperate and
coordinate among themselves, the political parties must not escape from
the democratic mechanism, i.e. the electoral mechanism and should struggle
for putting this mechanism straight. They should make it a reality and
the actual inlet for peaceful transfer of power and not to calculate their
immediate gains or losses. Even within the PGC, we expect to find in the
long-run that the popular majority would inevitably occupy its position
and gradually move into the influential core.
Mohammed Kahtan
Chairman of the Political Department, Islah Party
Faris
Al-Saqqaf: After 1994 War, Democracy Receded
In his address to the seminar of the Socialist Party on democracy held
on June 4, Dr Faris Al-Saqqaf said democracy in Yemen was the product of
external changes and alliance of the two ruling parties in 1990. We mean
the pluralist democracy that gave way to establishment of political parties.
The large-scale of press freedom was one of the aspects the democracy but
unfortunately after the war of 1994, the democratic pursuit receded and
its phenomena began to occupy narrower areas of application.
The democracy of 1990 was rather confined to the establishment of parties
and margin of press freedom, while equal opportunities did not exist owing
to the concentration of power, property and media and state institutions
in the hands of first the two ruling parties and then the ruling party.
Democracy here has not matured to the extent of peaceful transfer of power
but the political forces are pinning hope that this matter could be realized
by their peaceful struggle.
Rd added that before 1990 we talked about the absence of democracy
and now we are speaking of incomplete democracy. This undoubtedly dictates
on the opposition to stabilize the democratic culture and include it in
educational curriculums in addition to reforming the constitutional and
electoral system.
The political democratic attitudes of those who work in politics are
moving on two directions. Some see the no avail of the projected democratic
action because it establishes formality of democracy and gives legitimacy
to a political system not capable of achieving democracy the way it should.
The other trend sees it as a prelude to act and struggle within its boundary,
though narrow it may be, to enlarge it and to rely on the time factor and
change of people's awareness and conduct. We are used to repeatedly talk
about a critical vision or criticize the state or the political system
while at the same time we care not about the political opposition.
The political opposition itself is suffering from problems. Frankly
speaking, we speak out our demands from the political system and rulers,
whereas we ourselves, in our parties, are not qualified as an instrument
of change and do not possess the democratic specifications. Those who govern
the parties are minorities encompassing groups within them. The parties
are led by the symbol leader who represents the chief of the party. For
more than three decades party leaderships remain the same. They have not
been changed and have not conducted the transfer of party power and leadership.
How can we demand the political regime or the ruling party of that while
we do not practice it inside our organizations? We have to qualify ourselves,
as instruments of democracy, for that.
The parties must be social, meaning to be closely connected with the
society and its suffering, not only political . There are many issues and
problems in our country , such as illiteracy and people's living conditions.
These areas are not seen as part of the political parties programs and
are not part of their program of demands from the state.The society does
not feel that these parties represent it. They are merely, as I earlier
remarked, a reaction to the ruling party. They say the ruling party deals
blows to democracy and tightens its grip against it, nevertheless when
they were invited to a trip abroad, they responded positively. They respond
to invitations and dialogues extended by the president but they go as listeners
and without carrying a program or definite demands. The political parties
are requested to actually revise and reconsider their slogans, political
addresses and priorities, beginning from inside first.
Fares Al-Saqqaf, Future Studies Center
Oman: Renewal with Reason
written and illustrated by Dr. Hussein Shehadeh
The most important event in the modern history of the Sultanate of
Oman was the take-over of power in a bloodless coup by the then 29 year-old
Sultan Qaboos from his father on 23rd July 1970. That night is unforgettable
to the Omanis, who danced joyfully in the streets, welcoming an era of
vigor and vitality.
Sultan Qaboos bin Said meets you everywhere. His majesty waves and
blinks in gold along the six-lane motorway from the airport to the capital,
which just 29 years ago was trudged by camels and donkeys. In those days,
Oman's 300,000 square kilometers were served by less than 10 kilometers
of asphalted roads. Today 5,600 kilometers of asphalt criss-cross the country.
Muscat looks to the sea at the foot of the cliffs reflected in the
Gulf. Oman is clad in its best bib and tucker. Oman's renaissance under
Sultan Qaboos is celebrated for a whole week every November. On the hillsides,
stylish modern houses have opened their jewel cases, gems cascade down
the walls. Necklaces of emerald, scarlet and white adorn the skies in the
country's national colors.
All that has been achieved since 1970 can be attributed to Sultan Qaboos:
the roads, more than a thousand schools and the university with their 500,000
students, all the health centers, hospitals, telecommunications, radio
and TV stations, the international hotels, the motorways, domestic flights,
oil riches, tourism, social and environmental developments.
"Before 1970 there was one school in Salalah, where I live,"
says a 35-year-old Omani. " We sat under a tree, just as boys, and read
the Koran. Before 1970 we went to the mosque to pray for forgiveness for
the ruler we had. Now we go there to invoking blessings for the Sultan's
good health and long life, God willing. Now I can send all my kids to schools,
the girls included."
When Sultan Qaboos wanted to set about building his nation he opened
the doors to all his countrymen in exile, plus thousands of guest workers
from Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, the Philippines and Africa. Together,
Oman's 2.1 million inhabitants, of whom some 400,000 are foreigners, have
brought about developments which in many respects are unique.
The Omanis rapidly acclimatized themselves to riches, and development
continues unabated. This causes some concern so long as it remains uncertain
where the next billions will come from. The oil reserves will last a while
into the new millennium but Sultan Qaboos has long been talking of the
need to prepare other economic legs to stand on.
The encouragement of private initiative and "Oman-ization" are
the slogans these days. Omanis are already gradually taking over the jobs
now held by foreigners. However, Western experts are still largely responsible
for technical developments, while Indians, Pakistanis, Africans and Philippinos
sweep the streets, serve in the hotels and drive the limousines.
Omanis look to their past when they pluck up the courage for a future
with no guaranteed oil riches. They have worked hard, and have conquered
the world before.
What astonishes first time visitors to Oman even more than the spectacular
beaches, alpine mountain valleys, the fjord-like sunken valleys of the
Musandam Peninsula jutting into the Gulf, and the forbidding inland deserts
of shifting sands, is the care with which the country's natural wonders
and man-made conveniences are maintained. Oman's major highways and its
side roads have been broadened and well maintained. Its village houses
have been modernized within rules which requires owners to maintain the
contours and colors of traditional exteriors. And strict laws prohibit
littering and regulate food preparation, water purity, and trash disposal
to protect Oman's residents and their tourist guests.
For formal occasions Omani men also wear outer robes in a variety of
colors and a silver khanjar, a curved ceremonial dagger that is the mark
of adulthood for all Omani males.
Unspoiled Oman is a tourist paradise. Oman's leaders want to keep it
that way and they will not be "stampeded into permitting a hedonistic
Club Med atmosphere, although visitors who want a bottle of wine with their
dinner or who enjoy a beer or a cocktail in their rooms or in a bar, will
have no trouble in finding any of these things in Oman's first class hotels.
The preservation of tradition is not always an easy task when there are
so many tempting attractions in the modern world. The Omanis are a rationally
minded people, and the fear of eroding deeply rooted traditions and values
are, in reality, quite remote. Unlike its neighbors in the Gulf region,
Oman is a sea-faring nation that cultivated the land
From the very start the young Sultan tried to keep intact as much of
Oman's cultural inheritance as he could. He called upon the men to continue
wearing their traditional dishdashas, their long white gowns. In their
belts one still sees the symbol of masculinity, the khanjar, a curved Omani
dagger in a richly decorated sheath.
Women in Oman now get an education and are actively urged by the Sultan
to join the commercial community. Traditions are still honored, and especially
in Bedouin camps you will see many women wearing traditional masks, or
burqas.
This respect for tradition is paired with a sense of pride about progress.
Omanis actually talk of a renaissance, restoration for their country to
its former greatness. This enabled Oman to forge a reputation as a trading
and seafaring nation at an early stage by virtue of its position between
Asia and Africa and the monsoon winds.
-----
Hussein Shehadah is a Palestinian-born journalist and lecturer specializing
in Arab culture and society in the Scandinavian countries. Dr. Shehadah
has lived and worked in Denmark for more than 30 years.
|